Michael S. Ofsowitz
Associate Professor, Psychology

 

Home


Find me


Psychology


Miscellanea


Courses


Syllabi (CIS)


APA style


Correlations


PLAGIARISM


PSY 101 only


juicy stuff?


Author:   Michael Ofsowitz  
Posted: 9/15/2005; 8:21:59 PM
Topic: a paper-writing rubric
Msg #: 21 (top msg in thread)
Prev/Next: /80
Reads: 2270

The following can serve as a set of guidelines for analyzing the quality of written assignments.

 

UNDERSTANDING THE ASSIGNMENT

  • Does the paper show that the author understands the assignment?
  • Does the author seem to understand which skills and techniques are necessary to complete the assignment successfully?
  • Does the paper show that the author understands the general significance of the course and the essay as part of the course?
  • Does the paper show that the author understands the reading assignments relevant to this assignment?

SUBSTANCE

  • Does the paper give the impression that the author knows the subject matter and has made the information accessible to the reader?
  • Has the author focused the subject on a single, appropriate thesis?
  • Has the author reflected on how the assignment relates to "reality"?
  • Has the audience been targeted properly?
  • Is the purpose of the content clear?

ORGANIZATION

  • Are the author's intentions clearly expressed?
  • Are the methods or strategies used for developing the content clear?
  • Is the central idea sufficiently developed?
  • Is the organization of the paper logical and does it follow a clear sequence?
  • Are major and minor supports clearly defined to the reader?
  • Are introductions, transitions, and conclusions present, and are they clear and logical, and do they contain relevant information?

STYLE

  • Is the wording appropriate to the audience and to the writer's level of technical expertise?
  • Is the level of detail presented appropriate and consistent?
  • Is the overall tone or voice consistent and appropriate to the audience and subject matter?
  • Are the sentences structured effectively and correctly?
  • Are document design and presentation appropriate to the audience and subject matter?

CORRECTNESS

  • Has the author used correct grammar and effective sentence structures?
  • Is punctuation correct?
  • Have factual claims been substantiated by properly citing references and is there no plagiarism?
  • Is there a bibliography for all works cited within the paper?
  • Does the document fit the expected format, and is the appearance professional?